What is ‘effective’ CPD for contemporary physical education teachers? A Deweyan framework

Kathleen Armour, Mikael Quennerstedt, Fiona Chambers, Kyriaki Makopoulou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)
837 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is widely argued that continuing professional development (CPD) for physical education (PE) teachers is important, yet questions remain about ‘effective’ CPD. We consider these questions afresh from a Deweyan perspective. An overview of the CPD/PE-CPD literature reveals conflicting positions on teachers as learners. Considering the nature of contemporary PE, and the learning needs of teachers, we argue that a different model of PE-CPD is required to reflect the dynamic nature of contemporary practice. We propose John Dewey's classic concept of ‘education as growth’ to underpin a new conceptual framework for the design, delivery and evaluation of PE-CPD. We argue that ‘effective’ PE-CPD will not be found in formal policies, structures and processes, however, well-intentioned, unless it (i) focuses on the dazzling complexity of the learning process, (ii) prioritises context and contemporary challenges; (iii) bridges research/theory–practice in innovative ways; and (iv) nurtures the career-long growth of PE teachers.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSport Education and Society
Early online date14 Sept 2015
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Sept 2015

Keywords

  • teacher learning
  • contemporary learners
  • john dewey
  • education as growth
  • lifelong learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is ‘effective’ CPD for contemporary physical education teachers? A Deweyan framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this