Long-Term trends in air quality in major cities in the UK and India: a view from space

Karn Vohra, Eloise A. Marais*, Shannen Suckra, Louisa Kramer, William J. Bloss, Ravi Sahu, Abhishek Gaur, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, Pierre F. Coheur

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Air quality networks in cities can be costly and inconsistent and typically monitor a few pollutants. Spacebased instruments provide global coverage spanning more than a decade to determine trends in air quality, augmenting surface networks. Here we target cities in the UK (London and Birmingham) and India (Delhi and Kanpur) and use observations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), ammonia (NH3) from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI), formaldehyde (HCHO) from OMI as a proxy for non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), and aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for PM2:5. We assess the skill of these products at reproducing monthly variability in surface concentrations of air pollutants where available. We find temporal consistency between column and surface NO2 in cities in the UK and India (R D0.5 0.7) and NH3 at two of three rural sites in the UK (R D0.5 0.7) but not between AOD and surface PM2:5 (R 0.4). MODIS AOD is consistent with AERONET at sites in the UK and India (R 0.8) and reproduces a significant decline in surface PM2:5 in London (2.7%a1) and Birmingham (3.7%a1) since 2009. We derive long-Term trends in the four cities for 2005 2018 from OMI and MODIS and for 2008 2018 from IASI. Trends of all pollutants are positive in Delhi, suggesting no air quality improvements there, despite the roll-out of controls on industrial and transport sectors. Kanpur, identified by the WHO as the most polluted city in the world in 2018, experiences a significant and substantial (3.1%a1) increase in PM2:5. The decline of NO2, NH3, and PM2:5 in London and Birmingham is likely due in large part to emissions controls on vehicles. Trends are significant only for NO2 and PM2:5. Reactive NMVOCs decline in Birmingham, but the trend is not significant. There is a recent (2012 2018) steep (9%a1) increase in reactive NMVOCs in London. The cause for this rapid increase is uncertain but may reflect the increased contribution of oxygenated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from household products, the food and beverage industry, and domestic wood burning, with implications for the formation of ozone in a VOC-limited city.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6275-6296
Number of pages22
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume21
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
We thank the NERC Field Spectroscopy Facility, principal investigators, and their staff for establishing and maintaining the AERONET sites at Kanpur and Chilbolton and Peter Porter from Birmingham City Council for providing the surface network data for Birmingham. URLs and DOIs (if available) of the data used in this study are given in Sect. 2.

Financial support
This work was funded by a University of Birmingham Global Challenges Studentship awarded to Karn Vohra, a NERC/EPSRC grant (EP/R513465/1) awarded to Eloise A. Marais, a Chevening Scholarship from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and partner organisations awarded to Shannen Suckra, and a DBT grant (BT/IN/UK/APHH/41/KB/2016-17) and CPCB grant (AQM/Source apportionment_EPC Project/2017) awarded to Sachchida N. Tripathi. ULB research by Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, and Pierre-F. Coheur was supported by the Belgian State Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs (Prodex arrangement IASI.FLOW).

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term trends in air quality in major cities in the UK and India: a view from space'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this