Evidence-based practice: the use and abuse of research

Peter Imray*, Aglaia Lila Kossyvaki, Mike Sissons

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors of this position paper argue that there is currently very little evidence-based practice in relation to learners with severe learning disabilities (SLD) and profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD), and that which there is, has often been badly used and/or abused. More specifically, we argue that relevant educational research undertaken so far has a strong tendency towards: (i) conflating the need for common strategies to be universally used in teaching, with the ‘need’ for a common curriculum; (ii) quoting research that applies to children with certain types of SEND as though it applies to all children with SEND; (iii) assuming there is a homogeneity of learning disability among people with the same condition (for example Down's syndrome, autism) and (iv) encouraging assumptions that any academic progress, no matter how small the gain, is axiomatically superior in value for all pupils. The authors conclude that there is need for a new look at ‘evidence-based practice’ for these populations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-66
JournalSupport for Learning
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • profound
  • learning disabilities
  • intellectual disabilities
  • evidenced based teaching
  • research
  • severe
  • complex
  • learning difficulties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based practice: the use and abuse of research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this