TY - JOUR
T1 - Disciplinary regimes of ‘care’ and complementary alternative education
AU - Pennacchia, Jodie
PY - 2016/1/2
Y1 - 2016/1/2
N2 - In schools, the notion of ‘care is often synonymous with welfare and disciplinary regimes. Drawing on Foucault, and a study of alternative education (AE) across the UK, and looking in depth at two cases of complementary AE, we identify three types of disciplinary regimes at work in schools: (1) dominant performative reward and punishment, (2) team-building and (3) therapeutic. We argue that while all three regimes aim to steer identified students back to the norm, the two complementary approaches that we saw avoided the narrow instrumental behaviourist approaches of the dominant pattern. In so doing, they also opened up wider horizons of possibility and ways to be and become.
AB - In schools, the notion of ‘care is often synonymous with welfare and disciplinary regimes. Drawing on Foucault, and a study of alternative education (AE) across the UK, and looking in depth at two cases of complementary AE, we identify three types of disciplinary regimes at work in schools: (1) dominant performative reward and punishment, (2) team-building and (3) therapeutic. We argue that while all three regimes aim to steer identified students back to the norm, the two complementary approaches that we saw avoided the narrow instrumental behaviourist approaches of the dominant pattern. In so doing, they also opened up wider horizons of possibility and ways to be and become.
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1117506
U2 - 10.1080/17508487.2016.1117506
DO - 10.1080/17508487.2016.1117506
M3 - Article
SN - 1750-8487
VL - 57
SP - 84
EP - 99
JO - Critical Studies in Education
JF - Critical Studies in Education
IS - 1
ER -