Skills and motivations underlying children’s cumulative cultural learning: case not closed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Skills and motivations underlying children’s cumulative cultural learning: case not closed. / Reindl, E.; Gwilliams, A. L.; Dean, L. G.; Kendal, R. L.; Tennie, C.

In: Palgrave Communications, Vol. 6, No. 1, 106, 28.05.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{cb090e18c99544d39a5c3d41a4caa239,
title = "Skills and motivations underlying children{\textquoteright}s cumulative cultural learning: case not closed",
abstract = "The breakthrough study of Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) claimed that imitation, teaching, and prosociality were crucial for cumulative cultural learning. None of their child participants solved the final stage of their puzzlebox without social support, but it was not directly tested whether the solution was beyond the reach of individual children. We provide this missing asocial control condition, showing that children can reach the final stage of the puzzlebox without social support. We interpret these findings in the light of current understanding of cumulative culture: there are currently conflicting definitions of cumulative culture, which we argue can lead to drastically different interpretations of (these) experimental results. We conclude that the Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) puzzlebox fulfils a process-focused definition, but does not fulfil the (frequently used) product-focused definition. Accordingly, the precise role of social support for the apparent taxonomic distribution of cumulative culture and its ontogeny warrants further testing.",
author = "E. Reindl and Gwilliams, {A. L.} and Dean, {L. G.} and Kendal, {R. L.} and C. Tennie",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1057/s41599-020-0483-7",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Palgrave Communications",
issn = "2055-1045",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skills and motivations underlying children’s cumulative cultural learning: case not closed

AU - Reindl, E.

AU - Gwilliams, A. L.

AU - Dean, L. G.

AU - Kendal, R. L.

AU - Tennie, C.

PY - 2020/5/28

Y1 - 2020/5/28

N2 - The breakthrough study of Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) claimed that imitation, teaching, and prosociality were crucial for cumulative cultural learning. None of their child participants solved the final stage of their puzzlebox without social support, but it was not directly tested whether the solution was beyond the reach of individual children. We provide this missing asocial control condition, showing that children can reach the final stage of the puzzlebox without social support. We interpret these findings in the light of current understanding of cumulative culture: there are currently conflicting definitions of cumulative culture, which we argue can lead to drastically different interpretations of (these) experimental results. We conclude that the Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) puzzlebox fulfils a process-focused definition, but does not fulfil the (frequently used) product-focused definition. Accordingly, the precise role of social support for the apparent taxonomic distribution of cumulative culture and its ontogeny warrants further testing.

AB - The breakthrough study of Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) claimed that imitation, teaching, and prosociality were crucial for cumulative cultural learning. None of their child participants solved the final stage of their puzzlebox without social support, but it was not directly tested whether the solution was beyond the reach of individual children. We provide this missing asocial control condition, showing that children can reach the final stage of the puzzlebox without social support. We interpret these findings in the light of current understanding of cumulative culture: there are currently conflicting definitions of cumulative culture, which we argue can lead to drastically different interpretations of (these) experimental results. We conclude that the Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) puzzlebox fulfils a process-focused definition, but does not fulfil the (frequently used) product-focused definition. Accordingly, the precise role of social support for the apparent taxonomic distribution of cumulative culture and its ontogeny warrants further testing.

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-020-0483-7

DO - 10.1057/s41599-020-0483-7

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Palgrave Communications

JF - Palgrave Communications

SN - 2055-1045

IS - 1

M1 - 106

ER -