Skills and motivations underlying children’s cumulative cultural learning: case not closed

E. Reindl, A. L. Gwilliams, L. G. Dean, R. L. Kendal, C. Tennie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
108 Downloads (Pure)


The breakthrough study of Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) claimed that imitation, teaching, and prosociality were crucial for cumulative cultural learning. None of their child participants solved the final stage of their puzzlebox without social support, but it was not directly tested whether the solution was beyond the reach of individual children. We provide this missing asocial control condition, showing that children can reach the final stage of the puzzlebox without social support. We interpret these findings in the light of current understanding of cumulative culture: there are currently conflicting definitions of cumulative culture, which we argue can lead to drastically different interpretations of (these) experimental results. We conclude that the Dean et al. (Science 335:1114–1118, 2012) puzzlebox fulfils a process-focused definition, but does not fulfil the (frequently used) product-focused definition. Accordingly, the precise role of social support for the apparent taxonomic distribution of cumulative culture and its ontogeny warrants further testing.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106
JournalPalgrave Communications
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Skills and motivations underlying children’s cumulative cultural learning: case not closed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this