What is second-order vision for? Discriminating illumination versus material changes

Andrew Schofield, Paul Rock, Peng Sun, Xiaoyue Jiang, MA Georgeson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The human visual system is sensitive to second-order modulations of the local contrast (CM) or amplitude (AM) of a carrier signal. Second-order cues are detected independently of first-order luminance signals; however, it is not clear why vision should benefit from second-order sensitivity. Analysis of the first-and second-order contents of natural images suggests that these cues tend to occur together, but their phase relationship varies. We have shown that in-phase combinations of LM and AM are perceived as a shaded corrugated surface whereas the anti-phase combination can be seen as corrugated when presented alone or as a flat material change when presented in a plaid containing the in-phase cue. We now extend these findings using new stimulus types and a novel haptic matching task. We also introduce a computational model based on initially separate first-and second-order channels that are combined within orientation and subsequently across orientation to produce a shading signal. Contrast gain control allows the LM + AM cue to suppress responses to the LM - AM when presented in a plaid. Thus, the model sees LM - AM as flat in these circumstances. We conclude that second-order vision plays a key role in disambiguating the origin of luminance changes within an image.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

Keywords

  • spatial vision
  • computational modeling
  • shading
  • 3D surface and shape perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is second-order vision for? Discriminating illumination versus material changes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this