UK practice on incidentally detected non-functioning pituitary microadenomas: analysis of two national surveys during a 12-year interval

Ross Hamblin, Athanasios Fountas, Miles J. Levy, Niki Karavitaki*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal management approach for presumed non-functioning pituitary microadenomas (microNFPAs) remains unclear. Our aim was to capture current UK practice and identify changes with time.

Methods: Two online surveys investigating clinicians’ approaches were performed in 2009–2010 and 2021–2022 (advertised through Society for Endocrinology UK).

Results: 150 and 214 clinicians participated in the 2021 and 2009 survey, respectively (response rates 31.2% and 35.4%, respectively). At baseline, 2021 survey respondents were more likely to measure IGF-1 (96.0% vs 74.1%, p 
Conclusions: Diagnostic and management approaches for microNFPAs have evolved in the UK. Biochemical investigations are performed in accord with consensus guidelines, though many clinicians perform annual biochemical surveillance without tumour growth/symptoms. A small number of clinicians request imaging beyond 5 years, but the frequency of imaging intervals until discharge remains variable. Robust evidence on the long-term natural history of microNFPAs is necessary to unify clinician approach.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalPituitary
Volume2022
Early online date25 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Pituitary
  • Non-functioning
  • Microadenoma
  • Incidentaloma
  • Pituitary tumour

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'UK practice on incidentally detected non-functioning pituitary microadenomas: analysis of two national surveys during a 12-year interval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this