Two variants of ‘constrained participation’ in the care of vulnerable adults: A proof-of-concept study

Kristján Kristjánsson, Kristín Thórarinsdóttir

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    30 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    There has been a radical turn towards ideals of patient autonomy and person-centred care, and away from historically entrenched forms of medical paternalism, in the last 50 years of nursing practice. However, along the way, some shades of grey between the areas of ideal patient participation and of outright patient non-participation have been missed. The current article constitutes an exploratory proof-of-concept study of the real-world traction of a distinction-straddling concept of ‘constrained participation’ and its two sub-concepts of ‘fought-for participation’ and ‘forced-to participation’. In order to concretise these additions to the conceptual terrain of person-centred participation and its anti-theses, we apply them to themes in the care of vulnerable older adults. In the final section, we close by eliciting some characterological, educational and clinical implications of adding these new tools also to the conceptual repertoire of nursing practice and education.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalNursing Ethics
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2023

    Keywords

    • patient participation
    • constrained participation
    • fought-for participation
    • forced-to participation
    • vulnerable older adults

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two variants of ‘constrained participation’ in the care of vulnerable adults: A proof-of-concept study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this