Time-use and well-being impacts of travel-to-work and travel-for-work

Daniel Wheatley, Craig Bickerton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    114 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article contributes to understanding of the complex patterns of travel-to-work and travel-for-work which increasingly characterize highly skilled employment, using 2015 data from a UK Midlands study comprising an online survey and follow-up interviews. Travel-to-work essentially lengthens the working day, and is difficult to use productively, especially when commuting by car. Travel-for-work, by contrast, results in intense schedules especially when requiring overnight stays. Ownership of travel-for-work is ambiguous: it is employer driven, and travel time is often spent productively using mobile technologies, but is rarely rewarded with TOIL. While general dissatisfaction is reported with the commute, negative effects of travel-for-work (family, health, reduced leisure time) are mediated by positive impacts including experience of new working cultures, and infrequency of travel. Four factors appear central to the differing well-being impacts: (1) frequency of travel; (2) ability to plan travel; (3) productive use of travel time, and; (4) reciprocal benefits of travel.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)238-254
    JournalNew Technology, Work and Employment
    Volume31
    Issue number3
    Early online date15 Nov 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Nov 2016

    Keywords

    • highly skilled workers
    • subjective well-being
    • time-use
    • mobile working
    • travelfor-work
    • travel-to-work

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Time-use and well-being impacts of travel-to-work and travel-for-work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this