Abstract
This article examines the role the Moscow-Washington Hotline played in the 1967 Six-Day War, focusing on the Soviet side. We argue that the Soviet Union used the Direct Communication Link much more broadly than had been intended when the Hotline was agreed on in 1963 mainly because Moscow did not assign the Hotline any special diplomatic significance. We also show that the Hotline is a poor channel for crisis negotiations, and its efficacy as a communication tool is compromised if regular diplomatic channels cannot match its speed. Finally, we challenge the existing debate in the historiography of the Six-Day War, arguing for the importance of studying the implications of Soviet behaviour rather than Soviet intentions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 284-305 |
Journal | Journal of Transatlantic Studies |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 20 Jun 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Hotline
- diplomacy
- Cold War
- Soviet Union
- Middle East