The Philosophical Dimensions of Teachers' Research Literacy

Ben Kotzee*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, I investigate the place of philosophical literacy in teachers’ research literacy. Drawing on Pring, Bridges and Winch, I ask what the relationship is between being “research literate” in the field of education and understanding key philosophical debates in the field. I hold that properly implementing research findings in educational practice depends on a philosophical understanding of (a) normative, (b) conceptual and (c) methodological matters and that, therefore, “research literacy” in education must also include “philosophical literacy”. I question whether it is too much to expect that, in order to become research literate, teachers must also become philosophically literate. However, I demonstrate that questions of the utilisation of research cannot be separated from questions of the production of research. In the end, I hold that “research literacy” is simply a different way of looking at deep methodological questions that have always been part of the discipline of Education.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere5346
    Number of pages19
    JournalProfessions & Professionalism
    Volume13
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

    Keywords

    • Research literacy
    • evidence-based education
    • Christopher Winch
    • cognitive division of labour
    • philosophical literacy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Philosophical Dimensions of Teachers' Research Literacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this