The Limits to Dialogue

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    37 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The great hope of dialogical pedagogy such as the Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI) as advocated for by practitioners of philosophy for and with children (P4C) was to cultivate critical thinkers who would be guided by epistemic and moral virtues in their engagement with one another in an effort to uncover truth. And, further, that those democratic citizens could then take these newly honed skills out into the public square and enact good decision-making in their lives. The focus on equality and inclusion, with a respect for diversity of thought and opinion, guided a sense that every participant should feel as though they ‘belong’, and were free to engage in dialogue with others as equals. And yet, the question about how we might ensure the CoPI is a space in which everyone can meaningfully contribute is forefront in my mind. In this paper, I will focus on what might limit dialogue by explicating three main issues which I call ‘paying lip service’, ‘existing power dynamics’ and ‘the transfer problem’. I will see if I can respond to these in order to ultimately affirm the role for dialogical pedagogy to support radical listening and genuinely inclusive dialogue.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalOxford Review of Education
    Early online date8 Nov 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Nov 2023

    Keywords

    • Dialogue
    • pedagogy
    • Community of Inquiry
    • Philosophy for Children
    • epistemic virtues
    • Moral education

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Limits to Dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this