The First Mid-Infrared View of the Star-Forming Properties of Nearby Galaxy Groups

L Bai, J Rasmussen, JS Mulchaey, A Dariush, Somak Raychaudhury, Trevor Ponman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present the first mid-IR study of galaxy groups in the nearby universe based on Spitzer MIPS observations of a sample of nine redshift-selected groups from the XMM-IMACS project, at z = 0.06. We find that on average the star-forming (SF) galaxy fraction in the groups is about 30% lower than the value in the field and 30% higher than in clusters. The SF fractions do not show any systematic dependence on group velocity dispersion, total stellar mass, or the presence of an X-ray emitting intragroup medium, but a weak anti-correlation is seen between SF fraction and projected galaxy density. However, even in the densest regions, the SF fraction in groups is still higher than that in cluster outskirts, suggesting that preprocessing of galaxies in group environments is not sufficient to explain the much lower SF fraction in clusters. The typical specific star formation rates (SFRs/M-*) of SF galaxies in groups are similar to those in the field across a wide range of stellar mass (M-* > 10(9.6) M-circle dot), favoring a quickly acting mechanism that suppresses star formation to explain the overall smaller fraction of SF galaxies in groups. If galaxy -galaxy interactions are responsible, then the extremely low starburst galaxy fraction ( 10(10) M-circle dot), possibly as a consequence of ram pressure stripping being less efficient in removing gas frommoremassive galaxies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-650
Number of pages14
JournalThe Astrophysical Journal
Volume713
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2010

Keywords

  • galaxies: clusters: general
  • infrared: galaxies
  • galaxies: evolution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The First Mid-Infrared View of the Star-Forming Properties of Nearby Galaxy Groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this