The Effectiveness and Acceptability of Comprehensive and Multicomponent School Health Services: A Systematic Review

Paul Montgomery*, Wendy Knerr, David A. Ross, Jacoby Patterson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Comprehensive school-based health services were reviewed as part of preparing World Health Organization guidelines.

Methods: Six databases were searched for controlled trials with schoolchildren aged 5–19 years, involving school-linked health services incorporating 4 of 7 health areas.

Results: Seventeen quasi-experimental studies conducted in high-income countries found school health services associated with reductions in suicide planning (male: 7.1% vs. 7.7%, p < .01), hospitalization (relative risks 3.403, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.536 to 8.473, p < .05), emergency department visits (odds ratio .85, 95% CI .75 to .95, p = .006), school absence (odds ratio .78, 95% CI .69 to .87, p < .0001), carrying weapons (male: 16.1% vs. 25.1%, p < .01), fighting (male: 32.6% vs. 43.1%, p < .01), sexual activity (53.5% vs. 60.5%, p < .05), drinking alcohol (60.1% vs. 70.5%, p < .001), using drugs (28.0% vs. 38.3%, p < .001), and physical activity (female: 57.4% vs. 50.4%, p < .01). They can be cost-saving, were also associated with smoking and less contraceptive use, and had no effect on depression prevalence. Acceptability/satisfaction was good. The certainty of evidence was low to moderate. Heterogeneity was high for some outcomes.

Conclusions: Results suggest moderate desirable and trivial undesirable effects of school health services in high-income countries. This article compiles evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability into one review, enabling decision-makers to consider all essential factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-207
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume70
Issue number2
Early online date21 Sept 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by Program Grant 300350 (Improving information and accountability for women's, children's and adolescents' health) from the UK Department for International Development (DFID) to the World Health Organization (WHO) and Grant 69315 “Programme development for reproductive health” awarded to WHO by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). D.A.R. is a former staff member of the World Health Organization. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Sarah Dawson, Information Scientist at the University of Bristol, for help with database searching and Dr. Anders M. Bach-Mortensen, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, for his work with screening and data extraction. They also acknowledge the members of the School Health Services (SHS) Guideline Steering Group within the WHO Secretariat and UNESCO Headquarters, the SHS Guideline Development Group and external reviewers, and especially Dr. Nandi Siegfried, the SHS Guideline methodologist, and Dr. Kid Kohl for valuable feedback on earlier drafts.

Funding Information:
This work was supported by Program Grant 300350 (Improving information and accountability for women's, children's and adolescents' health) from the UK Department for International Development (DFID) to the World Health Organization (WHO) and Grant 69315 “Programme development for reproductive health” awarded to WHO by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). D.A.R. is a former staff member of the World Health Organization. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine

Keywords

  • Acceptability
  • Adolescent health
  • Child health
  • Effectiveness
  • School health services
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effectiveness and Acceptability of Comprehensive and Multicomponent School Health Services: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this