The effect of pH on plant litter decomposition and metal cycling in wetland mesocosms supplied with mine drainage

Lesley Batty, PL Younger

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The long term effectiveness of compost-based wetland systems treating net-acidic mine waters is reliant upon a continuing supply of decomposed organic matter which provides the basic foodstock for sulphate reducing bacteria. The annual turnover of wetland vegetation within these systems has been suggested to be the primary source for this material once the original substrate has been consumed. This study aimed to determine whether plant litter (of Common Reed, Phragmites australis) decomposition rates and release of metals and nutrients were affected by pH using controlled experiments under laboratory conditions. Loss of plant biomass was found to be unaffected by pH (3.0-6.5) suggesting that plant litter could be an important source of organic molecules for bacterial populations even under acidic conditions. The decomposing plant litter also acted as a focus for the precipitation of Fe oxides and sorption of Zn thereby acting as a short-term sink for these contaminants. This has important implications for geochemical cycling within the wetland system and potential transport out of the system. The essential nutrients (K and Mg) released from plant litter were affected by pH which could be important in nutrient availability for re-use by vegetation and other organisms within the system.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)158-164
    Number of pages7
    JournalChemosphere
    Volume66
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

    Keywords

    • nutrients
    • metal cycling
    • constructed wetlands
    • decomposition
    • acid mine drainage
    • plant litter

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of pH on plant litter decomposition and metal cycling in wetland mesocosms supplied with mine drainage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this