The case for 'beneficial constraints': Why permissive voluntarism impedes workplace cooperation in Ireland

Tony Dobbins*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Drawing on existing literature and two case studies of workplace cooperation in Ireland, this article illustrates that although Ireland has had national-level consensus bargaining since 1987, workplace-level cooperation is rare. This can be largely attributed to Ireland's permissive voluntarist institutional and employment relations context, characterized by limited institutional coordination linking national and workplace governance, and which renders workplaces particularly exposed to the contradictions of capitalism. The result is that few employers construct and maintain workplace bargains with their employees. Focusing on the concept of 'beneficial constraints' on employer choice, it is concluded that if efficient and fair workplace coalitions are to increase, the state would need to reform the permissive voluntarism dominating Irish employment relations by 'reinstitutionalizing' workplace pluralism through proactive policy interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-519
Number of pages23
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Keywords

  • economic change
  • employee participation
  • industrial democracy
  • institutions
  • labour-management cooperation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Business,Management and Accounting
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The case for 'beneficial constraints': Why permissive voluntarism impedes workplace cooperation in Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this