Abstract
Identifying the most deprived regions of any country or city is key if policy makers are to design successful interventions. However, locating areas with the greatest need is often surprisingly challenging in developing countries. Due to the logistical challenges of traditional household surveying, official statistics can be slow to be updated; estimates that exist can be coarse, a consequence of prohibitive costs and poor infrastructures; and mass urbanization can render manually surveyed figures rapidly out-of-date. Comparative judgement models, such as the Bradley–Terry model, offer a promising solution. Leveraging local knowledge, elicited via comparisons of different areas' affluence, such models can both simplify logistics and circumvent biases inherent to household surveys. Yet widespread adoption remains limited, due to the large amount of data existing approaches still require. We address this via development of a novel Bayesian Spatial Bradley–Terry model, which substantially decreases the number of comparisons required for effective inference. This model integrates a network representation of the city or country, along with assumptions of spatial smoothness that allow deprivation in one area to be informed by neighbouring areas. We demonstrate the practical effectiveness of this method, through a novel comparative judgement data set collected in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 288-308 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 10 Jan 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [grant references EP/T003928/1 and EP/R513283/1]. We also thank the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) for their support in data collection. We are grateful to the two reviewers and associate editor for helpful and constructive comments that have improved this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Statistical Society.
Keywords
- comparative judgement
- networks
- preference learning
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty