‘Some more reliable than others’: Image management, donor perceptions and the Global War on Terror in East African diplomacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
388 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores the role of perceptions in donor-African relations and the extent to which donor ‘images’ of African governments can be managed by these same governments to their advantage. The article focuses on donor views of ‘reliability’ in the Global War on Terror (GWOT) and compares differing international perceptions of Kenya and Uganda through this lens. Arguing that donors have an exaggerated sense of Ugandan ‘compliance’ or reliability and Kenyan unreliability in fighting terrorism, it explains this by examining the two governments’ international ‘image management’ strategies, or lack thereof. The analysis contends that Uganda's success at promoting itself as a major donor ally in the GWOT, compared with Kenya's general reluctance to do the same, has played a significant role in building and bolstering these differing donor perceptions. This, the article suggests, raises important questions about the nature of African agency in the international system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-31
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Modern African Studies
Volume51
Issue number01
Early online date25 Feb 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Some more reliable than others’: Image management, donor perceptions and the Global War on Terror in East African diplomacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this