TY - JOUR
T1 - Socioeconomic differences impact overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) prior to achievement of standard therapy
AU - Phillips, Andrew
AU - Kehoe, Sean
AU - Singh, Kavita
AU - Elattar, Ahmed
AU - Nevin, James
AU - Balega, Janos
AU - Pounds, Rachel
AU - Elmodir, Ahmed
AU - Pascoe, Jennifer
AU - Fernando, Indrajit
AU - Sundar, Sudha
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Purpose: Survival difference between socioeconomic groups with ovarian cancer has persisted in the United Kingdom despite efforts to reduce disparities in care. Our aim was to delineate critical episodes in the patient journey, where deprivation has most impact on survival. Methods: A retrospective review of 834 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) between 16/8/07–16/2/17 at a large cancer centre serving one of the most deprived areas of the UK. Using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), patients were categorised into five groups. Results: Surgery was more common in less deprived patients (p < 0.00001). Across IMD groups, there were no differences in complete (R0) cytoreduction rate (r = 0.18, p > 0.05), age, or comorbidity. The R0/total cohort rate increased with increasing IMD group (p < 0.0001). Patients refusing any intervention belonged exclusively to the three most deprived groups; 5/7 patients who refused surgery belonged to the most deprived IMD group. Overall survival in the total patient group was less in IMD group 1–2 compared to 9–10 (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, IMD group was not an independent predictor of survival (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Socioeconomic differences in survival manifest in patients not receiving surgical treatment for AOC and are not purely explained by comorbidity, age, stage, or histological factors.
AB - Purpose: Survival difference between socioeconomic groups with ovarian cancer has persisted in the United Kingdom despite efforts to reduce disparities in care. Our aim was to delineate critical episodes in the patient journey, where deprivation has most impact on survival. Methods: A retrospective review of 834 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) between 16/8/07–16/2/17 at a large cancer centre serving one of the most deprived areas of the UK. Using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), patients were categorised into five groups. Results: Surgery was more common in less deprived patients (p < 0.00001). Across IMD groups, there were no differences in complete (R0) cytoreduction rate (r = 0.18, p > 0.05), age, or comorbidity. The R0/total cohort rate increased with increasing IMD group (p < 0.0001). Patients refusing any intervention belonged exclusively to the three most deprived groups; 5/7 patients who refused surgery belonged to the most deprived IMD group. Overall survival in the total patient group was less in IMD group 1–2 compared to 9–10 (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, IMD group was not an independent predictor of survival (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Socioeconomic differences in survival manifest in patients not receiving surgical treatment for AOC and are not purely explained by comorbidity, age, stage, or histological factors.
KW - Cancer
KW - Charlson
KW - Cytoreduction
KW - Deprivation
KW - Ovarian
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071027415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-019-05269-8
DO - 10.1007/s00404-019-05269-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 31414175
AN - SCOPUS:85071027415
SN - 0932-0067
VL - 300
SP - 1261
EP - 1270
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 5
ER -