Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy for Polycythemia Vera Intolerant or Resistant to Hydroxycarbamide in a Randomized Trial

Claire N. Harrison*, Jyoti Nangalia, Rebecca Boucher, Aimee Jackson, Christina Yap, Jennifer O'Sullivan, Sonia Fox, Isaak Ailts, Amylou C. Dueck, Holly L. Geyer, Ruben A. Mesa, William G. Dunn, Eugene Nadezhdin, Natalia Curto-Garcia, Anna Green, Bridget Wilkins, Jason Coppell, John Laurie, Mamta Garg, Joanne EwingSteven Knapper, Josephine Crowe, Frederick Chen, Ioannis Koutsavlis, Anna Godfrey, Siamak Arami, Mark Drummond, Jennifer Byrne, Fiona Clark, Carolyn Mead-Harvey, Elizabeth Joanna Baxter, Mary Frances McMullin, Adam J. Mead

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by JAK/STAT activation, thrombotic/hemorrhagic events, systemic symptoms, and disease transformation. In high-risk PV, ruxolitinib controls blood counts and improves symptoms.

Patients and Methods: MAJIC-PV is a randomized phase II trial of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients resistant/intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC-INT/RES). Primary outcome was complete response (CR) within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included duration of response, event-free survival (EFS), symptom, and molecular response.

Results: One hundred eighty patients were randomly assigned. CR was achieved in 40 (43%) patients on ruxolitinib versus 23 (26%) on BAT (odds ratio, 2.12; 90% CI, 1.25 to 3.60; P = .02). Duration of CR was superior for ruxolitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.61; P < .001). Symptom responses were better with ruxolitinib and durable. EFS (major thrombosis, hemorrhage, transformation, and death) was superior for patients attaining CR within 1 year (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.78; P = .01); and those on ruxolitinib (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P = .03). Serial analysis of JAK2V617F variant allele fraction revealed molecular response was more frequent with ruxolitinib and was associated with improved outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] P = .001, EFS P = .001, overall survival P = .01) and clearance of JAK2V617F stem/progenitor cells. ASXL1 mutations predicted for adverse EFS (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.47 to 6.17; P = .003). The safety profile of ruxolitinib was as previously reported.

Conclusion: The MAJIC-PV study demonstrates ruxolitinib treatment benefits HC-INT/RES PV patients with superior CR, and EFS as well as molecular response; importantly also demonstrating for the first time, to our knowledge, that molecular response is linked to EFS, PFS, and OS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3534-3544
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume41
Issue number19
Early online date1 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by Blood Cancer UK under the Trials Acceleration Program (TAP). An unrestricted educational grant was provided to support the trial and adjunctive science by Novartis.

Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Clinical Oncology.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy for Polycythemia Vera Intolerant or Resistant to Hydroxycarbamide in a Randomized Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this