Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: II. Cómo identificar los estudios relevantes

K. S. Khan; A. Bueno-Cavanillas; J. Zamora

doi:10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006

Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: II. Cómo identificar los estudios relevantes

Translated title of the contribution: Systematic reviews in five steps: II. Identifying relevant literature

K. S. Khan, A. Bueno-Cavanillas^*, J. Zamora

^*Corresponding author for this work

Metabolism and Systems Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

124 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article focuses on the second step of a systematic review, i.e. how to identify relevant studies for the planned review. The search, using terms related to the questions framed in the previous step, should be comprehensive. However, it is important to establish selection criteria to include relevant studies and to exclude those that might present a risk of bias at this stage. Details such as broadening the spectrum of electronic databases consulted, avoiding restricting searches to a single language, managing references correctly, and recording decisions made throughout the process are winning factors for successful study identification.

Translated title of the contribution	Systematic reviews in five steps: II. Identifying relevant literature
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	431-436
Number of pages	6
Journal	Medicina de Familia - SEMERGEN
Volume	48
Issue number	6
Early online date	3 May 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006
Publication status	Published - Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Agradecemos a Daniel Gavilán Cabello su colaboración en la traducción de este artículo. Khalid S. Khan está contratado por la Universidad de Granada como investigador distinguido gracias a una ayuda del programa Beatriz Galindo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, España.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN)

Keywords

Databases
Exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
Literature search
Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Family Practice

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006Licence: None: All rights reserved

khank2022revisionesIIAccepted author manuscript, 950 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)

Cite this

@article{3dbc82d99fae4ef1a061b85ef46dab41,

title = "Revisiones sistem{\'a}ticas en cinco pasos: II. C{\'o}mo identificar los estudios relevantes",

abstract = "This article focuses on the second step of a systematic review, i.e. how to identify relevant studies for the planned review. The search, using terms related to the questions framed in the previous step, should be comprehensive. However, it is important to establish selection criteria to include relevant studies and to exclude those that might present a risk of bias at this stage. Details such as broadening the spectrum of electronic databases consulted, avoiding restricting searches to a single language, managing references correctly, and recording decisions made throughout the process are winning factors for successful study identification.",

keywords = "Databases, Exclusion criteria, Inclusion criteria, Literature search, Systematic review",

author = "Khan, {K. S.} and A. Bueno-Cavanillas and J. Zamora",

note = "Funding Information: Agradecemos a Daniel Gavil{\'a}n Cabello su colaboraci{\'o}n en la traducci{\'o}n de este art{\'i}culo. Khalid S. Khan est{\'a} contratado por la Universidad de Granada como investigador distinguido gracias a una ayuda del programa Beatriz Galindo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci{\'o}n y Universidades, Espa{\~n}a. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Sociedad Espa{\~n}ola de M{\'e}dicos de Atenci{\'o}n Primaria (SEMERGEN)",

year = "2022",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "48",

pages = "431--436",

journal = "Medicina de Familia - SEMERGEN",

issn = "1138-3593",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos

T2 - II. Cómo identificar los estudios relevantes

AU - Khan, K. S.

AU - Bueno-Cavanillas, A.

AU - Zamora, J.

N1 - Funding Information: Agradecemos a Daniel Gavilán Cabello su colaboración en la traducción de este artículo. Khalid S. Khan está contratado por la Universidad de Granada como investigador distinguido gracias a una ayuda del programa Beatriz Galindo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, España. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN)

PY - 2022/9

Y1 - 2022/9

N2 - This article focuses on the second step of a systematic review, i.e. how to identify relevant studies for the planned review. The search, using terms related to the questions framed in the previous step, should be comprehensive. However, it is important to establish selection criteria to include relevant studies and to exclude those that might present a risk of bias at this stage. Details such as broadening the spectrum of electronic databases consulted, avoiding restricting searches to a single language, managing references correctly, and recording decisions made throughout the process are winning factors for successful study identification.

AB - This article focuses on the second step of a systematic review, i.e. how to identify relevant studies for the planned review. The search, using terms related to the questions framed in the previous step, should be comprehensive. However, it is important to establish selection criteria to include relevant studies and to exclude those that might present a risk of bias at this stage. Details such as broadening the spectrum of electronic databases consulted, avoiding restricting searches to a single language, managing references correctly, and recording decisions made throughout the process are winning factors for successful study identification.

KW - Databases

KW - Exclusion criteria

KW - Inclusion criteria

KW - Literature search

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129356741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006

M3 - Short survey

AN - SCOPUS:85129356741

SN - 1138-3593

VL - 48

SP - 431

EP - 436

JO - Medicina de Familia - SEMERGEN

JF - Medicina de Familia - SEMERGEN

IS - 6

ER -

Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: II. Cómo identificar los estudios relevantes

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this