Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: I. Cómo formular una pregunta para la que se pueda obtener una respuesta válida

Translated title of the contribution: Systematic reviews in five steps: I. Framing questions to obtain valid answers

Khalid S Khan, A. Bueno Cavanillas*, J. Zamora

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This is the first in a series of five articles on the steps to follow to conduct a successful systematic review. This first article addresses how to formulate the right questions to initiate a systematic review. The key issues are: how to structure the questions appropriately according to the main components: the participants, the interventions or exposures compared, the outcomes measured and the study design; how to anticipate and consider possible variations in each of the components that may arise during the review; and finally, how to prospectively register the protocol of the systematic review.

Translated title of the contributionSystematic reviews in five steps: I. Framing questions to obtain valid answers
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)356-361
Number of pages6
JournalMedicina de Familia - SEMERGEN
Volume48
Issue number5
Early online date23 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Agradecemos a Daniel Gavilán Cabello su colaboración en la traducción de este artículo. Khalid S. Khan está contratado por la Universidad de Granada como investigador distinguido, gracias a una ayuda del programa Beatriz Galindo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, España.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN)

Keywords

  • Comparation
  • Design
  • Effect
  • Exposure
  • Intervention
  • Participants
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic reviews in five steps: I. Framing questions to obtain valid answers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this