Reliability of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Muscle Perfusion in Health and Peripheral Arterial Disease

Kate N Thomas, James D Cotter, Samuel J E Lucas, Brigid G Hill, André M van Rij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the reliability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessing calf muscle microvascular perfusion in health and disease. Response to a post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia test was repeated on two occasions >48 h apart in healthy young (28 ± 7 y) and elderly controls (70 ± 5 y), and in peripheral arterial disease patients (PAD, 69 ± 7 y; n = 10, 9 and 8 respectively). Overall, within-individual reliability was poor (coefficient of variation [CV] range: 15-87%); the most reliable parameter was time to peak (TTP, 15-48% CV). Nevertheless, TTP was twice as long in elderly controls and PAD compared to young (19.3 ± 10.4 and 22.0 ± 8.6 vs. 8.9 ± 6.2 s respectively; p < 0.01), and area under the curve for contrast intensity post-occlusion (a reflection of blood volume) was ∼50% lower in elderly controls (p < 0.01 versus PAD and young). Thus, CEUS assessment of muscle perfusion during reactive hyperaemia demonstrated poor reliability, yet still distinguished differences between PAD patients, elderly and young controls.

Original languageEnglish
JournalUltrasound in Medicine & Biology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Oct 2014

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Muscle Perfusion in Health and Peripheral Arterial Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this