Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review

C R K Windows-Yule; M T Herald; A L Nicuşan; C S Wiggins; G Pratx; S Manger; A E Odo; T Leadbeater; J Pellico; R T M De rosales; A Renaud; I Govender; L B Carasik; A E Ruggles; Tz Kokalova-Wheldon; J P K Seville; D J Parker

doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c

Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review

C R K Windows-Yule, M T Herald, A L Nicuşan, C S Wiggins, G Pratx, S Manger, A E Odo, T Leadbeater, J Pellico, R T M De rosales, A Renaud, I Govender, L B Carasik, A E Ruggles, Tz Kokalova-Wheldon, J P K Seville, D J Parker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) is a technique which allows the high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging of particulate and multiphase systems, including systems which are large, dense, and/or optically opaque, and thus difficult to study using other methodologies. In this work, we bring together researchers from the world's foremost PEPT facilities not only to give a balanced and detailed overview and review of the technique but, for the first time, provide a rigorous, direct, quantitative assessment of the relative strengths and weaknesses of all contemporary PEPT methodologies. We provide detailed explanations of the methodologies explored, including also interactive code examples allowing the reader to actively explore, edit and apply the algorithms discussed. The suite of benchmarking tests performed and described within the document is made available in an open-source repository for future researchers.

Original language	English
Article number	016101
Number of pages	45
Journal	Reports on Progress in Physics
Volume	85
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c
Publication status	Published - 7 Jan 2022

Keywords

positron imaging
positron emission particle tracking
granular materials
multiphase systems
biomedical imaging
particulate media

Access to Document

10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c

Cite this

Windows-Yule, C. R. K., Herald, M. T., Nicuşan, A. L., Wiggins, C. S., Pratx, G., Manger, S., Odo, A. E., Leadbeater, T., Pellico, J., De rosales, R. T. M., Renaud, A., Govender, I., Carasik, L. B., Ruggles, A. E., Kokalova-Wheldon, T., Seville, J. P. K., & Parker, D. J. (2022). Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 85(1), Article 016101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c

@article{2719d5c828e04a57a06806542506a9fa,

title = "Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review",

abstract = "Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) is a technique which allows the high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging of particulate and multiphase systems, including systems which are large, dense, and/or optically opaque, and thus difficult to study using other methodologies. In this work, we bring together researchers from the world's foremost PEPT facilities not only to give a balanced and detailed overview and review of the technique but, for the first time, provide a rigorous, direct, quantitative assessment of the relative strengths and weaknesses of all contemporary PEPT methodologies. We provide detailed explanations of the methodologies explored, including also interactive code examples allowing the reader to actively explore, edit and apply the algorithms discussed. The suite of benchmarking tests performed and described within the document is made available in an open-source repository for future researchers.",

keywords = "positron imaging, positron emission particle tracking, granular materials, multiphase systems, biomedical imaging, particulate media",

author = "Windows-Yule, {C R K} and Herald, {M T} and Nicu{\c s}an, {A L} and Wiggins, {C S} and G Pratx and S Manger and Odo, {A E} and T Leadbeater and J Pellico and {De rosales}, {R T M} and A Renaud and I Govender and Carasik, {L B} and Ruggles, {A E} and Tz Kokalova-Wheldon and Seville, {J P K} and Parker, {D J}",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

day = "7",

doi = "10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c",

language = "English",

volume = "85",

journal = "Reports on Progress in Physics",

issn = "0034-4885",

publisher = "IOP Publishing",

number = "1",

}

Windows-Yule, CRK, Herald, MT, Nicuşan, AL, Wiggins, CS, Pratx, G, Manger, S, Odo, AE, Leadbeater, T, Pellico, J, De rosales, RTM, Renaud, A, Govender, I, Carasik, LB, Ruggles, AE, Kokalova-Wheldon, T, Seville, JPK & Parker, DJ 2022, 'Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review', Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 85, no. 1, 016101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking

T2 - a comparative review

AU - Windows-Yule, C R K

AU - Herald, M T

AU - Nicuşan, A L

AU - Wiggins, C S

AU - Pratx, G

AU - Manger, S

AU - Odo, A E

AU - Leadbeater, T

AU - Pellico, J

AU - De rosales, R T M

AU - Renaud, A

AU - Govender, I

AU - Carasik, L B

AU - Ruggles, A E

AU - Kokalova-Wheldon, Tz

AU - Seville, J P K

AU - Parker, D J

PY - 2022/1/7

Y1 - 2022/1/7

N2 - Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) is a technique which allows the high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging of particulate and multiphase systems, including systems which are large, dense, and/or optically opaque, and thus difficult to study using other methodologies. In this work, we bring together researchers from the world's foremost PEPT facilities not only to give a balanced and detailed overview and review of the technique but, for the first time, provide a rigorous, direct, quantitative assessment of the relative strengths and weaknesses of all contemporary PEPT methodologies. We provide detailed explanations of the methodologies explored, including also interactive code examples allowing the reader to actively explore, edit and apply the algorithms discussed. The suite of benchmarking tests performed and described within the document is made available in an open-source repository for future researchers.

AB - Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) is a technique which allows the high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging of particulate and multiphase systems, including systems which are large, dense, and/or optically opaque, and thus difficult to study using other methodologies. In this work, we bring together researchers from the world's foremost PEPT facilities not only to give a balanced and detailed overview and review of the technique but, for the first time, provide a rigorous, direct, quantitative assessment of the relative strengths and weaknesses of all contemporary PEPT methodologies. We provide detailed explanations of the methodologies explored, including also interactive code examples allowing the reader to actively explore, edit and apply the algorithms discussed. The suite of benchmarking tests performed and described within the document is made available in an open-source repository for future researchers.

KW - positron imaging

KW - positron emission particle tracking

KW - granular materials

KW - multiphase systems

KW - biomedical imaging

KW - particulate media

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c

DO - 10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c

M3 - Review article

SN - 0034-4885

VL - 85

JO - Reports on Progress in Physics

JF - Reports on Progress in Physics

IS - 1

M1 - 016101

ER -

Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this