Abstract
In this paper, we offer a brief overview of the debate between realism and anti-realism in the philosophy of science. On the background of that debate, we consider two recently developed approaches aimed at vindicating realist intuitions while acknowledging the limitations of scientific knowledge. Perspectivalists explain disagreement in science without giving up the idea that currently accepted scientific theories describe reality largely accurately: they posit the existence of different perspectives within which scientific claims can be produced and tested. The integrative approach instead encourages researchers to embrace pluralism: conflicting frameworks and methodologies can be integrated when new knowledge is gained. In the natural and human sciences, researchers sometimes behave as if perspectivism is true; at other times, they hope for a reconciliation between conflicting frameworks and believe that this can be achieved by progressively filling knowledge gaps.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Interdisciplinary Science Reviews |
Early online date | 21 Dec 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- scientific realism
- instrumentalism in science
- objectivity
- truth
- perspectival realism
- integrative approaches
- disagreeemnt
- scientific progress