Abstract
Existing analyses of the implications of price-cap regulation for the development of cost-reducing technologies assume that all R&D is done by the regulated industry. This is unrealistic. We present a simple model of non-cooperative R&D by a regulated firm and a single 'external' developer under a price-cap regime of the sort characterised by Cabral and Riordan. In equilibrium the external developer exerts less R&D than is socially optimal, the regulated firm may exert more or less. A 'tightening' of the regulatory regime impacts the R&D incentives of both players, though in different ways. The optimal regulatory-adjustment parameter may be bigger or smaller than that suggested by existing studies. Despite the scope for duplication of results, research by an outsider necessarily enhances welfare.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 137-151 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Public Economics |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 1998 |
Keywords
- Cost-reducing technologies
- Monopolies
- Price-cap regulation
- Technical change
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics