Post-Truth Politics as Discursive Violence: Online Abuse, the Public Sphere, and the Figure of ‘The Expert’

Charlotte Galpin*, Patrick Vernon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

‘Post-truth politics’ indicates a contemporary state of public distrust around the legitimacy of knowledge, shaped by the hybrid media landscape. In the present moment, women, LGBTQ+ and racialised individuals also receive unprecedented levels of online abuse. Scholars have attributed responsibility for disinformation to social media, and linked post-truth discourse to angry accusations of lying and dishonesty. Yet, online abuse of experts/academics has not been conceptually or empirically connected to post-truth. We analyse Facebook comments on right-wing news articles that question the expertise of academics during Brexit. Using queer theory, we argue that online abuse of experts staged by newspapers is a form of post-truth communication involving a process of bordering through which gendered, sexualised or racialised bodies are considered incompatible with academic expertise. This process legitimises extraordinary abuse including threats of sexual violence. Only by asking intentional questions about gender, sexuality, and race can we fully understand the post-truth condition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Early online date10 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Oct 2023

Keywords

  • post-truth
  • queer theory
  • media
  • Gender based violence
  • online abuse
  • Brexit
  • social media
  • public sphere
  • Higher Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-Truth Politics as Discursive Violence: Online Abuse, the Public Sphere, and the Figure of ‘The Expert’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this