Abstract
Urgent and emergency care services face increasing pressure, impacting patient care. We evaluated the performance of acute medicine services, assessing clinical quality indicators for unplanned medical admissions to acute hospital services. 152 acute UK hospital services accepting unplanned admissions to acute and general internal medicine completed a day-of-care survey incorporating organisational structure questionnaire and patient-level data over a pre-defined 24-hour period in June 2022. Clinical quality indicators were: Early Warning Score (EWS) measurement within 30 min of hospital arrival; clinician assessment within 4 h; assessment by consultant physician within 6 h (daytime) or 14 h (night-time). Results were compared with 2019, 2020, 2021. 7293 sequential patients were included (and compared with 19,817 patients across 2019-2021). In 2022, 69% of patients (95%CI 67.7-69.9%) had an EWS documented within 30 min. 79% of patients (95%CI 77.8-79.7%) were reviewed by a clinical decision maker within 4 h of hospital arrival. Patients assessed in Same Day Emergency Care services were more likely to meet this target than those assessed in Acute Medical Units or Emergency Departments (OR 2.4, 95%CI 2.02-2.87, p<0.001). Overall, 50% of patients received consultant physician review within the target time (3065/6161, 95%CI 48.5-51.0%); performance varied with time of arrival and location of initial assessment. Performance against all three clinical quality indicators was lower than 2019, 2020 and 2021 (p<0.001 for all). Performance against all quality indicators within acute medicine services is deteriorating. However, performance in Same Day Emergency Care Units is greater than in Acute Medical Units or Emergency Departments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 89-97 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | European Journal of Internal Medicine |
Volume | 118 |
Early online date | 4 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).Funding
The database for SAMBA is funded by the Society for Acute Medicine. This study was also supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) through salary support to DSL. CA is supported by an NIHR Academic Clinical Lectureship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.