'Own-Label' Versus Branded Commercial Dental Resin Composite Materials: Mechanical And Physical Property Comparisons

Kathryn Shaw, Ricardo Martins, Mohammed Abdul Hadis, Trevor Burke, William Palin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A majority of dental materials are manufactured by companies who have experience in the field. However, a number of "own label" materials have become available, principally marketed by distributors and other companies with little or no experience in the field. These materials are attractive because of their reduced cost, but they may have no research on which clinicians might base their potential performance. It is therefore the purpose of this work to compare the performance of different batches of a number of "own-label" dental materials with a similar number from manufacturers with experience in the field, using a variety of laboratory test regimes which include filler determination, degree of conversion, flexural strength and flexural modulus, in order to evaluate key material properties. The results indicated that own-label dental resin composites produced similar results to materials from established companies in terms of flexural strength characteristics and degree of conversion. However, a greater batch-to-batch variation in several mechanical and physical properties of the own-label materials was noted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-129
Number of pages8
JournalThe European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright© 2016 Dennis Barber Ltd.

Keywords

  • Degree of Conversion
  • Filler
  • Flexural Modulus
  • Own-label
  • Private-Label
  • Resin Composite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Own-Label' Versus Branded Commercial Dental Resin Composite Materials: Mechanical And Physical Property Comparisons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this