Offering payments, reimbursement and incentives to patients and family doctors to encourage participation in research

Heather Draper, Sue Wilson, Sarah Flanagan, Jonathan Ives

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    27 Citations (Scopus)


    Sometimes researchers fail to meet their recruitment targets, and sometimes it is predicted that recruitment may prove difficult but it is not obvious what ethical latitude researchers have to boost participation by, for instance, paying participants to take part or by paying family doctors to recruit patients to participate. In this paper, we distinguish between payment, reimbursement and inducement. We look first at the ethics of paying research participants. We conclude that payment raises all kinds of ethical difficulties, but that reimbursement-025EFwhilst not completely unproblematic-025EFis an ethical requirement. We then look at whether some inducement to participate is acceptable and conclude that it is. We continue by asking whether the same arguments can be applied to encouraging family doctors to recruit patients. We conclude that it is right for family doctors to be reimbursed for the costs of recruiting research participants and also argue that there are fewer problems with paying family doctors to recruit patients than there are with paying research participants. Given, however, that there is a fine line between reimbursement and payment, given the potential for conflicts of interests to arise, and given that even suspicion of such a conflict might undermine trust in doctors, systems of both payment and reimbursement need to be transparent.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)231-238
    Number of pages8
    JournalFamily Practice
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2009


    • Research ethics
    • inducements in research
    • reimbursements in research
    • payments in research


    Dive into the research topics of 'Offering payments, reimbursement and incentives to patients and family doctors to encourage participation in research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this