Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to confront a well-known problem in interreligious engagement in European institutions, namely the tendency to exclude contributions that do not conform to certain European expectations. It diagnoses problems produced not only by the problem but by certain solutions to it, and to propose in outline an alternative approach. Chief among these problems is the imperative that members of traditions articulate their deepest moral commitments, in order to secure a common moral ground. This imperative has the unintended but drastic effect of excluding important voices in dialogue. Drawing on the figures of Cordelia (in Shakespeare’s King Lear) and Antigone (in Sophocles’ Antigone) it is argued that forced articulation distorts its objects. The theoretical framework of discussion is drawn from Hegel, Schelling, and Adorno as in interpreted by Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and Andrew Bowie. The originality of the argument is the use of aesthetic theory in German philosophy to inform a critique of attempts to make morality central to interreligious engagement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 309-325 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | International Journal of Philosophy and Theology |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 20 Feb 2024 |
Keywords
- Articulation
- morality
- ethics
- Antigone
- King Lear
- scriptural reasoning