Obstacles to Moral Articulation in Interreligious Engagement

Nicholas Adams*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to confront a well-known problem in interreligious engagement in European institutions, namely the tendency to exclude contributions that do not conform to certain European expectations. It diagnoses problems produced not only by the problem but by certain solutions to it, and to propose in outline an alternative approach. Chief among these problems is the imperative that members of traditions articulate their deepest moral commitments, in order to secure a common moral ground. This imperative has the unintended but drastic effect of excluding important voices in dialogue. Drawing on the figures of Cordelia (in Shakespeare’s King Lear) and Antigone (in Sophocles’ Antigone) it is argued that forced articulation distorts its objects. The theoretical framework of discussion is drawn from Hegel, Schelling, and Adorno as in interpreted by Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and Andrew Bowie. The originality of the argument is the use of aesthetic theory in German philosophy to inform a critique of attempts to make morality central to interreligious engagement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-325
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Philosophy and Theology
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Articulation
  • morality
  • ethics
  • Antigone
  • King Lear
  • scriptural reasoning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Obstacles to Moral Articulation in Interreligious Engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this