TY - JOUR
T1 - Noninvasive assessment of liver disease severity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes
AU - Pennisi, Grazia
AU - Enea, Marco
AU - Falco, Vincenzo
AU - Aithal, Guruprasad P
AU - Palaniyappan, Naaventhan
AU - Yilmaz, Yusuf
AU - Boursier, Jerome
AU - Cassinotto, Christophe
AU - de Lédinghen, Victor
AU - Chan, Wah Kheong
AU - Mahadeva, Sanjiv
AU - Eddowes, Peter
AU - Newsome, Philip
AU - Karlas, Thomas
AU - Wiegand, Johannes
AU - Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun
AU - Schattenberg, Jörn M
AU - Labenz, Christian
AU - Kim, Won
AU - Lee, Myoung Seok
AU - Lupsor-Platon, Monica
AU - Cobbold, Jeremy F L
AU - Fan, Jian-Gao
AU - Shen, Feng
AU - Staufer, Katharina
AU - Trauner, Michael
AU - Stauber, Rudolf
AU - Nakajima, Atsushi
AU - Yoneda, Masato
AU - Bugianesi, Elisabetta
AU - Younes, Ramy
AU - Gaia, Silvia
AU - Zheng, Ming-Hua
AU - Cammà, Calogero
AU - Anstee, Quentin M
AU - Mózes, Ferenc Emil
AU - Pavlides, Michael
AU - Petta, Salvatore
N1 - Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of simple non-invasive tests(NITs) in NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes(T2D).METHODS: This was an individual patient data meta-analysis of 1780 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and T2D. The index tests of interest were FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score(NFS), APRI, liver stiffness measurement(LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography(VCTE) and AGILE 3+. The target conditions were advanced fibrosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH) and fibrotic NASH(NASH plus F2-F4 fibrosis). The diagnostic performance of NITs individually or in sequential combination was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic curve(AUROC) and by decision curve analysis(DCA). Comparison with 2278 NAFLD patients without T2D was also made.RESULTS: In NAFLD with T2D LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed both NFS and FIB-4 for advanced fibrosis(AUROC:LSM 0.82,AGILE 3+ 0.82,NFS 0.72,FIB-4 0.75,APRI 0.68;p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests), with an uncertainty area of 12%-20%.The combination of serum-based with LSM-based tests for advanced fibrosis led to a reduction of 40% to 60% in necessary LSM tests. DCA showed that all scores had modest net benefit for ruling-out advanced fibrosis at the risk threshold of 5%-10% of missing advanced fibrosis. LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed both NFS and FIB-4 for fibrotic NASH(AUROC LSM 0.79,AGILE 3+ 0.77,NFS 0.71,FIB-4 0.71;p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests). All noninvasive scores were sub-optimal for diagnosing NASH.CONCLUSIONS: LSM and AGILE 3+ individually or in low availability setting in sequential combination after FIB-4 or NFS have a similar good diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for fibrotic NASH in NAFLD patients with T2D.
AB - BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of simple non-invasive tests(NITs) in NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes(T2D).METHODS: This was an individual patient data meta-analysis of 1780 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and T2D. The index tests of interest were FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score(NFS), APRI, liver stiffness measurement(LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography(VCTE) and AGILE 3+. The target conditions were advanced fibrosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH) and fibrotic NASH(NASH plus F2-F4 fibrosis). The diagnostic performance of NITs individually or in sequential combination was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic curve(AUROC) and by decision curve analysis(DCA). Comparison with 2278 NAFLD patients without T2D was also made.RESULTS: In NAFLD with T2D LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed both NFS and FIB-4 for advanced fibrosis(AUROC:LSM 0.82,AGILE 3+ 0.82,NFS 0.72,FIB-4 0.75,APRI 0.68;p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests), with an uncertainty area of 12%-20%.The combination of serum-based with LSM-based tests for advanced fibrosis led to a reduction of 40% to 60% in necessary LSM tests. DCA showed that all scores had modest net benefit for ruling-out advanced fibrosis at the risk threshold of 5%-10% of missing advanced fibrosis. LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed both NFS and FIB-4 for fibrotic NASH(AUROC LSM 0.79,AGILE 3+ 0.77,NFS 0.71,FIB-4 0.71;p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests). All noninvasive scores were sub-optimal for diagnosing NASH.CONCLUSIONS: LSM and AGILE 3+ individually or in low availability setting in sequential combination after FIB-4 or NFS have a similar good diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for fibrotic NASH in NAFLD patients with T2D.
U2 - 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000351
DO - 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000351
M3 - Article
C2 - 36924031
SN - 0270-9139
VL - 78
SP - 195
EP - 211
JO - Hepatology
JF - Hepatology
IS - 1
ER -