TY - JOUR
T1 - Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST)
T2 - a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial
AU - CATALYST investigators
AU - Fisher, Benjamin A
AU - Veenith, Tonny
AU - Slade, Daniel
AU - Gaskell, Charlotte
AU - Rowland, Matthew
AU - Whitehouse, Tony
AU - Scriven, James
AU - Parekh, Dhruv
AU - Balasubramaniam, Madhu S
AU - Cooke, Graham
AU - Morley, Nick
AU - Gabriel, Zoe
AU - Wise, Matthew P
AU - Porter, Joanna
AU - McShane, Helen
AU - Ho, Ling-Pei
AU - Newsome, Philip N
AU - Rowe, Anna
AU - Sharpe, Rowena
AU - Thickett, David R
AU - Bion, Julian
AU - Gates, Simon
AU - Richards, Duncan
AU - Kearns, Pamela
AU - Williams, Bryan
AU - Turner, Rebecca
AU - Libri, Vincenzo
AU - Mussai, Francis
AU - Middleton, Gary
AU - Bowden, Sarah
AU - Bangash, Mansoor
AU - Gao-Smith, Fang
AU - Patel, Jaimin
AU - Sapey, Elizabeth
AU - Thomas, Mark
AU - Coles, Mark
AU - Watkinson, Peter
AU - Rahman, Naj
AU - Angus, Brian
AU - Mentzer, Alexander J.
AU - Novak, Alex
AU - Feldman, Marc
AU - Richter, Alex
AU - Faustini, Sian
AU - Bathurst, Camilla
AU - Van de Wiel, Joseph
AU - Mee, Susie
AU - James, Karen
AU - Turner, Karen
AU - Hill, Adam
AU - Gordon, Anthony
AU - Yap, Christina
AU - Matthay, Michael
AU - McAuley, Danny
AU - Hall, Andrew
AU - Dark, Paul
AU - McMichael, Andrew
N1 - Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials. Methods: In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903. Findings: Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment–time interactions were –0·09 (95% CI –0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (–0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group. Interpretation: Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation—as measured by CRP concentration—in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19. Funding: Medical Research Council.
AB - Background: Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials. Methods: In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903. Findings: Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment–time interactions were –0·09 (95% CI –0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (–0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group. Interpretation: Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation—as measured by CRP concentration—in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19. Funding: Medical Research Council.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122952256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4
DO - 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 34922649
SN - 2213-2600
VL - 10
SP - 255
EP - 266
JO - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
JF - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
IS - 3
ER -