@inproceedings{4bd574f231e34950b23f57b7c470d8b4,
title = "Mud, blood and not so much poppycock",
abstract = "This article explores the origins of the {\textquoteleft}myths{\textquoteright} that have come to dominate popular memory of the First World War in Britain. Perceptions of the conflict as a bloody exercise in futility, orchestrated by inept generals, and fought in fields of mud are undoubtedly unrepresentative. Yet, far from pure fiction, such impressions can be historicised. Drawing on wider research into soldiers{\textquoteright} perception of crisis during 1914–1918, this piece argues that the kernel of many of these {\textquoteleft}myths{\textquoteright} can be found in the lived experience of the western front in 1917.",
keywords = "Battle of Passchendaele, First World War, historical memory, historical myths, morale, 20th century Britain",
author = "Alex Mayhew",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.32912/bulletin/21/7",
language = "English",
series = "Bulletin of the Auckland Museum",
publisher = "Auckland Museum",
pages = "39--44",
editor = "Gail Romano and Kingsley Baird",
booktitle = "The Enduring Impact of the First World War",
note = "The Myriad Faces of War: 1917 and its Legacy Symposium ; Conference date: 25-04-2016 Through 25-04-2016",
}
