Medical students' attitudes towards abortion: a UK study

R Gleeson, E Forde, E Bates, S Powell, E Eadon-Jones, Heather Draper

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: There is little research into medical students' or doctors' attitudes to abortion, yet knowing this is important, as policy makers should be aware of the views held by professionals directly involved in abortion provision and changing views may have practical implications for the provision of abortion in the future. Methods: We surveyed 300 medical students about their views on abortion, their beliefs about the status of the fetus and the rights of the mother, their attitude towards UK law and their willingness to be involved in abortion provision as qualified doctors. Results: 62% of medical students were pro-choice, 33% pro-life and 7% undecided. Students' views correlated with gender, year of study and holding a religious belief. Their beliefs about abortion, the status of the fetus and the rights of women significantly correlated with their attitudes towards the UK law and their willingness to be involved in abortion provision. Students' willingness to be involved in abortion provision was related to their views on abortion, the extent of participation required, the circumstances of the pregnancy and the stage of pregnancy. Conclusions: The percentage of pro-choice students was lower than that found in research on general practitioners' attitudes to abortion. It is unclear whether this is because students become more pro-choice as they progress through their medical career or because there is genuinely a change in attitudes to abortion.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)783-787
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
    Volume34
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Medical students' attitudes towards abortion: a UK study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this