Measurement of D-meson production versus multiplicity in p-Pb collisions at √sNN=5.02 TeV

J Adam, Lee Barnby, David Evans, Katie Graham, Peter Jones, Anton Jusko, Marian Krivda, Graham Lee, Roman Lietava, Orlando Villalobos Baillie, Nima Zardoshti, ALICE Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
137 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The measurement of prompt D-meson production as a function of multiplicity in p-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV with the ALICE detector at the LHC is reported. D0, D+ and D*+ mesons are reconstructed via their hadronic decay channels in the centre-of-mass rapidity range -0.96 < y cms < 0.04 and transverse momentum interval 1 < pT < 24 GeV/c. The multiplicity dependence of D-meson production is examined by either comparing yields in p-Pb collisions in different event classes, selected based on the multiplicity of produced particles or zero-degree energy, with those in pp collisions, scaled by the number of binary nucleon-nucleon collisions (nuclear modication factor); as well as by evaluating the per-event yields in p-Pb collisions in different multiplicity intervals normalised to the multiplicity-integrated ones (relative yields). The nuclear modication factors for D0, D+ and D*+ are consistent with one another. The D-meson nuclear modication factors as a function of the zero-degree energy are consistent with unity within uncertainties in the measured pT regions and event classes. The relative D-meson yields, calculated in various pT intervals, increase as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity. The results are compared with the equivalent pp measurements at √s = 7 TeV as well as with EPOS 3 calculations
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of High Energy Physics
Volume8
Issue number78
Early online date11 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement of D-meson production versus multiplicity in p-Pb collisions at √sNN=5.02 TeV'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this