Manipulation in U.S. REIT Investment Performance Evaluation: Empirical Evidence

Jamie Alcock, John Glascock, Eva Steiner*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)


We investigate whether Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) managers actively manipulate performance measures in spite of the strict regulation under the REIT regime. We provide empirical evidence that is consistent with this hypothesis. Specifically, manipulation strategies may rely on the opportunistic use of leverage. However, manipulation does not appear to be uniform across REIT sectors and seems to become more common as the level of competition in the underlying property sector increases. We employ a set of commonly used traditional performance measures and a recently developed manipulation-proof measure (MPPM, Goetzmann et al., Rev Finan Stud 20(5):1503-1546, 2007) to evaluate the performance of 147 REITs from seven different property sectors over the period 1991-2009. Our findings suggest that the existing REIT regulation may fail to mitigate a substantial agency conflict and that investors can benefit from evaluating return information carefully in order to avoid potentially manipulative funds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434-465
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013


  • Manipulation
  • Performance evaluation
  • Real estate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Urban Studies


Dive into the research topics of 'Manipulation in U.S. REIT Investment Performance Evaluation: Empirical Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this