Legalising MRT in the United Kingdom

Rebecca Dimond, Neil Stephens

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explains how the United Kingdom became the first country to legalise mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT). The authors explore the UK historical context, the stringent yet liberal approach to supporting embryo research that enables scientific development and clinical application. They then consider how safety, ethics, and public opinion were assessed, with key institutions concluding that there was clear patient need, benefits outweighed the risks, and that MRT was appropriate to be considered for clinical use. In part these assessments involved mobilising an ‘interpretive package’ through which the techniques were given meaning and where those meanings were contested. The authors consider how the work of review and debate were significant as they contributed to the production of an ethical future for MRT by making it knowable, desirable, ethical, and sanctionable. The chapter concludes by considering the legacy of the MRT debates and how they might shape contestations around CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReproduction Reborn
Subtitle of host publicationHow Science, Ethics, and Law Shape Mitochondrial Replacement Therapies
EditorsDiana Bowman, Karinne Ludlow , Walter G. Johnson
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter4
Pages87-107
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9780197616239
ISBN (Print)9780197616192, 9780197616208
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Oxford University Press 2023. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • embryo politics
  • ethical future
  • ethical review
  • gene editing
  • interpretive package
  • mitochondrial donation
  • public consultation
  • sociotechnical imaginary
  • United Kingdom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legalising MRT in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this