TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the NHS underfunded?
T2 - Three approaches to answering the question
AU - Al-Janabi, Hareth
AU - Williams, Iestyn
AU - Powell, Martin
PY - 2023/12/7
Y1 - 2023/12/7
N2 - The adequacy of funding for the National Health Service (NHS) is a perennial issue1,2 and one that has become particularly prominent in recent years.3 The way ‘underfunding’ is understood influences perceptions about how much resource is needed and where it ought to be channelled. This in turn has profound implications for patients, citizens and staff. In this article, we examine what it means to claim that health systems are underfunded and whether this applies to the contemporary NHS. We identify three main approaches to studying the issue and uncover the value judgements inherent in each approach. We argue that there is evidence to support the current claim of underfunding and conclude by suggesting future avenues for addressing this critical issue, both in the UK and elsewhere.
AB - The adequacy of funding for the National Health Service (NHS) is a perennial issue1,2 and one that has become particularly prominent in recent years.3 The way ‘underfunding’ is understood influences perceptions about how much resource is needed and where it ought to be channelled. This in turn has profound implications for patients, citizens and staff. In this article, we examine what it means to claim that health systems are underfunded and whether this applies to the contemporary NHS. We identify three main approaches to studying the issue and uncover the value judgements inherent in each approach. We argue that there is evidence to support the current claim of underfunding and conclude by suggesting future avenues for addressing this critical issue, both in the UK and elsewhere.
U2 - 10.1177/01410768231214340
DO - 10.1177/01410768231214340
M3 - Article
C2 - 38059823
SN - 0141-0768
VL - 116
SP - 409
EP - 412
JO - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
JF - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
IS - 12
ER -