Is the NHS underfunded? Three approaches to answering the question

Hareth Al-Janabi*, Iestyn Williams, Martin Powell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The adequacy of funding for the National Health Service (NHS) is a perennial issue1,2 and one that has become particularly prominent in recent years.3 The way ‘underfunding’ is understood influences perceptions about how much resource is needed and where it ought to be channelled. This in turn has profound implications for patients, citizens and staff. In this article, we examine what it means to claim that health systems are underfunded and whether this applies to the contemporary NHS. We identify three main approaches to studying the issue and uncover the value judgements inherent in each approach. We argue that there is evidence to support the current claim of underfunding and conclude by suggesting future avenues for addressing this critical issue, both in the UK and elsewhere.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409–412
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Volume116
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the NHS underfunded? Three approaches to answering the question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this