Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences

Gareth Carrol, Kathy Conklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
230 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research into recurrent, highly conventionalized “formulaic” sequences has shown a processing advantage compared to “novel” (non-formulaic) language. Studies of individual types of formulaic sequence often acknowledge the contribution of specific factors, but little work exists to compare the processing of different types of phrases with fundamentally different properties. We use eye-tracking to compare the processing of three types of formulaic phrases—idioms, binomials, and collocations—and consider whether overall frequency can explain the advantage for all three, relative to control phrases. Results show an advantage, as evidenced through shorter reading times, for all three types. While overall phrase frequency contributes much of the processing advantage, different types of phrase do show additional effects according to the specific properties that are relevant to each type: frequency, familiarity, and decomposability for idioms; predictability and semantic association for binomials; and mutual information for collocations. We discuss how the results contribute to our understanding of the representation and processing of multiword lexical units more broadly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-122
Number of pages28
JournalLanguage and Speech
Volume63
Issue number1
Early online date29 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

Keywords

  • Formulaic language
  • lexical processing
  • Collocations
  • Idioms
  • binomials
  • eye-tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this