Involving citizens in disinvestment decisions: what do health professionals think? Findings from a multi-method study in the English NHS

Tom Daniels, Iestyn Williams, Stirling Bryan, Craig Mitton, Suzanne Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Public involvement in disinvestment decision making in health care is widely advocated, and in some cases legally mandated. However, attempts to involve the public in other areas of health policy have been accused of tokenism and manipulation. This paper presents research into the views of local health care leaders in the English National Health Service (NHS) with regards to the involvement of citizens and local communities in disinvestment decision making. The research includes a Q study and follow-up interviews with a sample of health care clinicians and managers in senior roles in the English NHS. It finds that whilst initial responses suggest high levels of support for public involvement, further probing of attitudes and experiences shows higher levels of ambivalence and risk aversion and a far more cautious overall stance. This study has implications for the future of disinvestment activities and public involvement in health care systems faced with increased resource constraint. Recommendations are made for future research and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162 - 188
JournalHealth economics, policy, and law
Volume13
Issue number2
Early online date29 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Involving citizens in disinvestment decisions: what do health professionals think? Findings from a multi-method study in the English NHS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this