Investigator choice of standard therapy versus sequential novel therapy arms in the treatment of relapsed follicular lymphoma (REFRACT): study protocol for a multi-centre, open-label, randomised, phase II platform trial

Graham McIlroy*, Siân Lax, Charlotte Gaskell, Aimee Jackson, Malcolm Rhodes, Tania Seale, Sonia Fox, Lousie Hopkins, Jessica Okosun, Sally F. Barrington, Ingo Ringshausen, Alan G. Ramsay, Maria Calaminici, Kim Linton, Mark Bishton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (rrFL) is an incurable disease associated with shorter remissions and survival after each line of standard therapy. Many promising novel, chemotherapy-free therapies are in development, but few are licensed as their role in current treatment pathways is poorly defined.

Methods: The REFRACT trial is an investigator-initiated, UK National Cancer Research Institute, open-label, multi-centre, randomised phase II platform trial aimed at accelerating clinical development of novel therapies by addressing evidence gaps. The first of the three sequential novel therapy arms is epcoritamab plus lenalidomide, to be compared with investigator choice standard therapy (ICT). Patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy proven relapsed or refractory CD20 positive, grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma and assessable disease by PET-CT are eligible. The primary outcome is complete metabolic response by PET-CT at 24 weeks using the Deauville 5-point scale and Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary outcomes include overall metabolic response, progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5 L and FACT-Lym. The trial employs an innovative Bayesian design with a target sample size of 284 patients: 95 in the ICT arm and 189 in the novel therapy arms.

Discussion: Whilst there are many promising novel drugs in early clinical development for rrFL, understanding the relative efficacy and safety of these agents, and their place in modern treatment pathways, is limited by a lack of randomised trials and dearth of published outcomes for standard regimens to act as historic controls. Therefore, the aim of REFRACT is to provide an efficient platform to evaluate novel agents against standard therapies for rrFL. The adaptive Bayesian power prior methodology design will minimise patient numbers and accelerate trial delivery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05848765; 08-May-2023. EudraCT: 2022-000677-75; 10-Feb-2022.
Original languageEnglish
Article number370
Number of pages13
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding:
This trial, including the translational research, is financially supported by Cancer Research UK (CRCCTA-Dec21\100004) and Genmab. Genmab is also providing epcoritamab free of charge.

The trial protocol underwent full external peer review by the Cancer Research UK as part of the application process.

Role of funders.

The funders played no role in designing this trial or writing the protocol, nor will they be involved in data collection, data analysis, and data interpretation during the trial. The corresponding author had full access to all documentation and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Keywords

  • Relapsed follicular lymphoma
  • Adaptive design
  • Lenalidomide
  • Bayesian power prior methodology
  • Clinical trial
  • Epcoritamab

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigator choice of standard therapy versus sequential novel therapy arms in the treatment of relapsed follicular lymphoma (REFRACT): study protocol for a multi-centre, open-label, randomised, phase II platform trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this