Abstract
Objectives: An interferon (IFN) gene signature (IGS) is present in approximately 50% of early, treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis (eRA) patients where it has been shown to negatively impact initial response to treatment. We wished to validate this effect and explore potential mechanisms of action.
Methods: In a multicentre inception cohort of eRA patients (n=191), we examined the whole blood IGS (MxA, IFI44L, OAS1, IFI6, ISG15) with reference to circulating IFN proteins, clinical outcomes and epigenetic influences on circulating CD19+ B and CD4+ T lymphocytes.
Results: We reproduced our previous findings demonstrating a raised baseline IGS. We additionally showed, for the first time, that the IGS in eRA reflects circulating IFN-α protein. Paired longitudinal analysis demonstrated a significant reduction between baseline and 6-month IGS and IFN-α levels (p<0.0001 for both). Despite this fall, a raised baseline IGS predicted worse 6-month clinical outcomes such as increased disease activity score (DAS-28, p=0.025) and lower likelihood of a good EULAR clinical response (p=0.034), which was independent of other conventional predictors of disease activity and clinical response. Molecular analysis of CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells demonstrated differentially methylated CPG sites and dysregulated expression of disease relevant genes, including PARP9, STAT1, and EPSTI1, associated with baseline IGS/IFNα levels. Differentially methylated CPG sites implicated altered transcription factor binding in B cells (GATA3, ETSI, NFATC2, EZH2) and T cells (p300, HIF1α).
Conclusions: Our data suggest that, in eRA, IFN-α can cause a sustained, epigenetically mediated, pathogenic increase in lymphocyte activation and proliferation, and that the IGS is, therefore, a robust prognostic biomarker. Its persistent harmful effects provide a rationale for the initial therapeutic targeting of IFN-α in selected patients with eRA.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1214-1223 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases |
Volume | 81 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 9 Jun 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding Newcastle researchers received infrastructural support via the Versus Arthritis Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre (Ref 22072), funding from The Medical Research Council; Academy of Medical Sciences; British Society of Rheumatology; The Wellcome Trust; JGW Patterson Foundation; Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease Biobank in the UK (IMID-Bio-UK); Connect Immune Research; ANR and RTCure. This work was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre for Ageing and Long-Term Conditions; views expressed are the authors’ and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute of Health and Care Research or the Department of Health.
Competing interests JDI discloses research grants from Pfizer, Janssen and GSK; conference support from Eli Lilly and Gilead; speaker/consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Roche and UCB. FAHC discloses speaker fees from AstraZeneca.The remaining authors have no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Keywords
- Antirheumatic agents
- Arthritis
- Immune system diseases
- Inflammation
- Rheumatoid
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Rheumatology
- Immunology and Allergy
- Immunology
- General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology