Abstract
Implicit sequence learning is an integral part of human experience, yet the nature of the mechanisms underlying this type of learning remains a matter of debate. In the current study, we provide a test for two accounts of implicit sequence learning, that is, one that highlights sequence learning in the absence of any motor responses (with suppressed eye movements) and one that highlights the relative contribution of the motor processes (i.e., eye movements) to learning. To adjudicate between these accounts and determine whether a motor response is a requisite process in sequence learning, we used anticipation measures to compare performance on the standard oculomotor serial reaction time (SRT) task and on a version of the SRT task where the eye movements were restricted during the learning phase. our results demonstrated an increased proportion of correct anticipations in the standard SRT task compared to the restricted-movement task.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 221-228 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Experimental psychology |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 17 Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- implicit learning
- sequence learning
- motor learning
- perceptual learning
- SRT task