Iconicity in language processing and acquisition: What signed languages reveal

Robin L. Thompson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

That linguistic form should be arbitrarily linked to meaning is generally taken as a fundamental feature of language. However, this paper explores the role of iconicity, or non-arbitrary form-meaning mappings for both language processing and language acquisition. Evidence from signed language research is presented showing that sign language users exploit iconicity in language processing. Further, iconicity may be at work in language acquisition serving to bridge the gap between conceptual representations and linguistic form. Signed languages are taken as a starting point since they tend to encode a higher degree of iconic form-meaning mappings than is found for spoken languages, but the findings are more broadly applicable. Specifically, the emerging evidence argues against the dominant view that connections between linguistic form and meaning need be primarily arbitrary. Instead both arbitrariness and iconicity have a role to play in language.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-616
Number of pages14
JournalLinguistics and Language Compass
Volume5
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Iconicity in language processing and acquisition: What signed languages reveal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this