TY - JOUR
T1 - Harmonising knowledge for safer materials via the “NanoCommons” Knowledge Base
AU - Maier, Dieter
AU - Exner, Thomas e.
AU - Papadiamantis, Anastasios g.
AU - Ammar, Ammar
AU - Tsoumanis, Andreas
AU - Doganis, Philip
AU - Rouse, Ian
AU - Slater, Luke t.
AU - Gkoutos, Georgios v.
AU - Jeliazkova, Nina
AU - Ilgenfritz, Hilmar
AU - Ziegler, Martin
AU - Gerhard, Beatrix
AU - Kopetsky, Sebastian
AU - Joshi, Deven
AU - Walker, Lee
AU - Svendsen, Claus
AU - Sarimveis, Haralambos
AU - Lobaskin, Vladimir
AU - Himly, Martin
AU - Van rijn, Jeaphianne
AU - Winckers, Laurent
AU - Millán acosta, Javier
AU - Willighagen, Egon
AU - Melagraki, Georgia
AU - Afantitis, Antreas
AU - Lynch, Iseult
N1 - Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. European Commission and UKRI Guarantee Fund for Horizon Europe. Funding from the following Grants enabled the presented results: EU H2020 research infrastructure for nanosafety project NanoCommons (Grant Agreement No. 731032), EU H2020 nanoinformatics project NanoSolveIT (Grant Agreement No. 814572), EU H2020 NMs safety project NanoFASE (Grant Agreement No. 646002), EU FP7 NMs safety project NanoMILE (Grant Agreement No. 310451), EU H2020 nanomaterial safety project SmartNanoTox (Grant Agreement No. 686098), EU H2020 nanomaterial characterisation project NanoPAT (Grant Agreement No. 862583) and EU H2020 GreenDeal chemical mixture safety project PANORAMIX (Grant Agreement No. 101036631). Additional support was provided by the Horizon Europe project WorldFAIR (Grant Agreement No. 101058393) and the Innovate UK support for UoB participation in WorldFAIR (Grant No. 1831977).
PY - 2023/11/13
Y1 - 2023/11/13
N2 - In mediaeval Europe, the term “commons” described the way that communities managed land that was held “in common” and provided a clear set of rules for how this “common land” was used and developed by, and for, the community. Similarly, as we move towards an increasingly knowledge-based society where data is the new oil, new approaches to sharing and jointly owning publicly funded research data are needed to maximise its added value. Such common management approaches will extend the data’s useful life and facilitate its reuse for a range of additional purposes, from modelling, to meta-analysis to regulatory risk assessment as examples relevant to nanosafety data. This “commons” approach to nanosafety data and nanoinformatics infrastructure provision, co-development, and maintenance is at the heart of the “NanoCommons” project and underpins its post-funding transition to providing a basis on which other initiatives and projects can build. The present paper summarises part of the NanoCommons infrastructure called the NanoCommons Knowledge Base. It provides interoperability for nanosafety data sources and tools, on both semantic and technical levels. The NanoCommons Knowledge Base connects knowledge and provides both programmatic (via an Application Programming Interface) and a user-friendly graphical interface to enable (and democratise) access to state of the art tools for nanomaterials safety prediction, NMs design for safety and sustainability, and NMs risk assessment, as well. In addition, the standards and interfaces for interoperability, e.g., file templates to contribute data to the NanoCommons, are described, and a snapshot of the range and breadth of nanoinformatics tools and models that have already been integrated are presented Finally, we demonstrate how the NanoCommons Knowledge Base can support users in the FAIRification of their experimental workflows and how the NanoCommons Knowledge Base itself has progressed towards richer compliance with the FAIR principles.
AB - In mediaeval Europe, the term “commons” described the way that communities managed land that was held “in common” and provided a clear set of rules for how this “common land” was used and developed by, and for, the community. Similarly, as we move towards an increasingly knowledge-based society where data is the new oil, new approaches to sharing and jointly owning publicly funded research data are needed to maximise its added value. Such common management approaches will extend the data’s useful life and facilitate its reuse for a range of additional purposes, from modelling, to meta-analysis to regulatory risk assessment as examples relevant to nanosafety data. This “commons” approach to nanosafety data and nanoinformatics infrastructure provision, co-development, and maintenance is at the heart of the “NanoCommons” project and underpins its post-funding transition to providing a basis on which other initiatives and projects can build. The present paper summarises part of the NanoCommons infrastructure called the NanoCommons Knowledge Base. It provides interoperability for nanosafety data sources and tools, on both semantic and technical levels. The NanoCommons Knowledge Base connects knowledge and provides both programmatic (via an Application Programming Interface) and a user-friendly graphical interface to enable (and democratise) access to state of the art tools for nanomaterials safety prediction, NMs design for safety and sustainability, and NMs risk assessment, as well. In addition, the standards and interfaces for interoperability, e.g., file templates to contribute data to the NanoCommons, are described, and a snapshot of the range and breadth of nanoinformatics tools and models that have already been integrated are presented Finally, we demonstrate how the NanoCommons Knowledge Base can support users in the FAIRification of their experimental workflows and how the NanoCommons Knowledge Base itself has progressed towards richer compliance with the FAIR principles.
KW - nanosafety
KW - materials modelling
KW - nanoinformatics
KW - safe and sustainable by design
KW - FAIR data
KW - semantic knowledge graphs
KW - data infrastructure
KW - data democratisation
U2 - 10.3389/fphy.2023.1271842
DO - 10.3389/fphy.2023.1271842
M3 - Article
SN - 2296-424X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Physics
JF - Frontiers in Physics
M1 - 1271842
ER -