Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment

In this article, we undertake an empirical examination of the psychology of what is often called “the angry citizen,” high‐
lighting ressentiment as an important emotional mechanism of grievance politics. Contrary to the short‐lived, action‐prone
emotion of anger proper, ressentiment transmutes the inputs of grievance politics like deprivation of opportunity, injustice,
shame, humiliation, envy, and inefficacious anger, into the anti‐social outputs of morally righteous indignation, destructive
anger, hatred, and rage. Our empirical probe uses qualitative and quantitative analysis of 164 excerpts from interviews
with US “angry citizens” from the following works: Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American
Right (2016) by Arlie Russell Hochschild, Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era (2017) by Michael
Kimmel, and Stiffed: The Roots of Modern Male Rage (2019) by Susan Faludi. In these seemingly “angry” excerpts, we find
markers matching the psychological footprint of ressentiment instead of anger proper: victimhood, envy, powerlessness;
the defenses of splitting, projection, and denial; and preference for inaction, anti‐preferences, and low efficacy. We con‐
clude on the significance of the distinction between anger proper and ressentiment for understanding the psychology of
grievance politics.