Global differences in current strength and conditioning practice within soccer

Stephen J McQuilliam*, David R Clark, Robert M Erskine, Thomas E Brownlee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Differences exist between top-tier soccer leagues (e.g. anthropometry and match demands), which may influence strength and conditioning (S&C) practice. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate whether current S&C practice in men's and women's (first team and academy) squads differed between global regions. A total of 170 participants, involved in the delivery of S&C support at their soccer club (based on South America (SA), the USA, the UK, or other European countries (EUR)), completed a survey examining their S&C methods. The survey comprised six sections: (i) academic qualifications and S&C coaching experience; and their preferred methods for (ii) physical testing; (iii) strength and power development; (iv) plyometric training; (v) speed development; and (vi) periodization. Coaches in EUR conducted fewer formal S&C sessions, placed less importance on free-weight resistance training (RT), and performed less speed and plyometric training compared to coaches in other global regions (all p 
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Early online date28 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Association football
  • bodyweight training
  • free-weight resistance training
  • periodization
  • plyometrics
  • speed development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global differences in current strength and conditioning practice within soccer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this