Abstract
This essay considers how Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) assesses the function and limits of ‘ideas’ in two ways: by focusing on how ideas (plural) can be reduced, through the operations of power, to an idea (singular); and by investigating how people can be turned into abstractions through the work of ideology. Attending throughout to the form of Orwell’s most famous novel, the essay positions Nineteen Eighty-Four in relation to Wyndham Lewis’s critique of Orwell in The Writer and the Absolute (1952); traces the origins of Orwell’s account of power and truth to his experiences in the Spanish Civil War; and compares Orwell’s writing with the work of H. G. Wells, a key precursor. The essay concludes with some reflections on Nineteen Eighty-Four’s ambiguous ending and on the ingenious yet problematic critical strategies through which a tincture of hope is discovered in this bleakest of bleak satires.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The British Novel of Ideas |
Subtitle of host publication | George Eliot to Zadie Smith |
Editors | Rachel Potter, Matthew Taunton |
Place of Publication | Cambridge |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Chapter | 15 |
Pages | 259-273 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Edition | 1 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009086745 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781316514320 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 5 Dec 2024 |